The Looming DJI Drone Ban

If you’ve heard the rumors that DJI drones are about to be banned in the United States and you’re feeling a wave of panic, you’re not alone. The drone community is buzzing with confusion, worry, and conflicting information. But here’s the truth: DJI is not banned—at least not yet.

However, there is a very specific deadline tied to December 23rd, 2025, that has everyone concerned. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll break down exactly what’s happening, what’s real, what’s proposed, and what you need to know to understand where things stand.

The Y2K Moment: Your Drone Won’t Crash on December 23rd

Let’s start with the most important clarification: No, your DJI drone isn’t going to crash land on December 23rd. Think of this like Y2K—remember when people thought the year 2000 would shut down every computer on Earth? That didn’t happen, and this won’t either (at least not like that).

The proposed ban is directly linked to FCC regulations, which affects future DJI products, not the drones already in operation.

Understanding the FCC’s Role in Drone Operations

What is the FCC?

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a government agency responsible for regulating all communication infrastructure in the United States, including:

• Radio systems
• Television broadcasts
• Internet infrastructure
• Satellites
• Wireless systems

While the FCC doesn’t control airspace or flight rules (that’s the FAA’s job), it plays a crucial role in determining whether drones can legally operate in the United States.

The FCC Equipment Authorization Requirement

Every drone in the US must receive FCC equipment authorization to legally operate its wireless communication systems. This includes:

• Radio transmitters
• Receivers
• Video transmission systems

Without FCC approval, a drone cannot be sold, marketed, or activated for legal use in the United States.

The “Covered List” and What It Means for DJI

What is the Covered List?

In 2021, the FCC created what’s known as the “covered list”—a designation for companies considered threats to national security. Companies like Huawei and ZTE were added to this list in early 2021.

The Implications

Once a company is on the covered list, the FCC is prohibited by law from approving any new products from that company. This is why we haven’t seen any new Huawei or ZTE products since 2021.

For DJI, this means:

• ✅ Existing drones already certified by the FCC remain legal to fly
• ❌ No new DJI drones can be legally approved moving forward
• ❌ Major hardware updates requiring recertification cannot be approved

Important: DJI has not yet been added to the covered list, but it’s on the chopping block to be added by default if certain conditions aren’t met by December 23rd, 2025.

The Legislative Push: Who’s Behind the Ban?

Congressional Leadership

The effort to restrict or potentially ban DJI drones is being driven primarily by Congress, where concerns about Chinese technology and national security have gained broad bipartisan support.

Representative Elise Stefanik has been one of the most visible figures leading this push, backing several bills aimed at limiting DJI’s presence in the US market, including:

• The Countering CCP Drones Act – Seeks to designate DJI as a security risk and prevent future products from gaining necessary approvals

The Argument

Lawmakers argue that because DJI is headquartered in China, it could be compelled under Chinese law to share data with the Chinese Communist Party, creating potential vulnerabilities if its drones operate in sensitive US environments.

The December 23rd Deadline

The legislative pressure culminated in Section 5949 of the FY2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which effectively sets a deadline:

If no US agency completes a formal security review of DJI by December 23rd, 2025, the company will be blocked from receiving new authorizations—resulting in a de facto ban on new DJI products.

Critics call this a “ban by inaction,” while supporters view it as a precautionary safeguard.

The Security Concerns: What We Know

The 2017 Cybersecurity Findings

Security concerns around DJI aren’t new. In 2017, researcher Kevin Finisterre uncovered significant vulnerabilities in DJI’s cloud infrastructure, including:

• Unencrypted flight logs
• Exposed user data
• Developer keys that could be accessed by anyone

These findings were later cited in congressional conversations and policy briefings as evidence that DJI systems had insufficient protections, especially considering their widespread use among:

• Police departments
• Critical infrastructure teams
• Emergency response units

Note: These findings are from 2017, and DJI has made numerous updates since then.

DJI’s Response and Defense

DJI has consistently rejected accusations that it poses a security threat to the United States. The company maintains that:

• It is privately owned, not government-controlled
• It does not share data with any government, including China
• It provides features like local data mode, which fully disconnects a drone from outside communications
• Third-party audits have found no evidence of forced data transmission or intentional backdoors

DJI has publicly welcomed a full US government security review and stated it is willing to cooperate with whatever agencies may lead one. However, to date, no such review has been completed.

The Lobbying Battle: Both Sides Are Spending Big

Skydio’s Advocacy

Many in the industry point to Skydio, one of the leading US drone manufacturers, which has invested heavily in advocating for:

• Domestic-first procurement policies
• Higher cybersecurity standards for government-operated drones

Between 2020 and 2023, Skydio spent approximately $1.7 million on federal and state lobbying, including significant efforts in Florida that contributed to restrictions on foreign-made drones used by police agencies (not private entities).

Skydio publicly frames its involvement as an effort to strengthen American innovation and ensure secure technology for public safety and defense. The company has not explicitly called for a blanket ban on DJI, but the policies it supports naturally shift government demand toward US-made systems.

DJI’s Counter-Lobbying

Facing mounting pressure, DJI significantly expanded its own lobbying presence. Between 2020 and 2024, the company spent an estimated $7.4 million on federal lobbying, hiring:

• Major Washington consulting firms
• Former congressional staffers
• Former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch

DJI also helped support the Drone Advocacy Alliance, a domestic-facing organization aimed at giving operators who rely on DJI equipment a platform to push back against proposed bans.

Community Reaction: A Divided Industry

Those Opposed to the Ban

Many commercial operators, independent filmmakers, hobbyists, and small businesses view DJI as the most capable and cost-effective solution available. They see the ban as:

• Politically motivated
• Economically disruptive
• Lacking clear evidence

The core argument: There is no definitive proof that DJI has misused data or engaged in espionage on behalf of the Chinese government.

Those Supporting the Ban

Supporters, including some defense contractors, public safety agencies, and national security analysts, believe it’s safer to transition away from foreign-made systems in case theoretical risks become real over time.

However, even many supporters acknowledge that domestic systems are often more expensive, less capable, or less mature than DJI counterparts.

What Should Private Operators Do?

The Government vs. Private Sector Distinction

Here’s a key perspective: While it makes sense for the federal government to want agencies to move away from foreign-made hardware for sensitive operations, forcing private companies and independent operators to switch is a different matter entirely.

The principle: Just like we have the freedom to choose whatever phones or computers we want to buy, we should have the freedom to choose the drones we operate—especially in the private sector.

For Government Operations

When it comes to military, law enforcement, and critical infrastructure work, transitioning to domestically built systems is arguably the right move. That’s a different level of responsibility and exposure.

For Private Operators

Private operators should maintain the freedom of choice. The concern is that government-level security decisions are being applied to the private sector, where the risks and requirements are fundamentally different.

What Happens Next? Three Possible Outcomes

Outcome 1: Deadline Extension ⏰

The government has pushed deadlines like this before. An extension would allow time for an actual security review instead of a default automatic ban.

Likelihood: Possible, but uncertain.

Outcome 2: The TikTok Solution 🤝

In 2025, TikTok avoided a nationwide US ban by agreeing to a forced divestiture that:

• Shifted American operations into a new US-controlled entity
• Established majority American ownership
• Implemented US-based servers
• Created oversight from a US board and cloud provider

DJI could follow a similar path by:

• Establishing a truly US-based subsidiary with American majority ownership
• Reallocating data, firmware oversight, and radio communication compliance to US soil
• Creating a firewall between the Chinese parent company and all US manufacturing, code, and telemetry systems

This would likely be the smartest play for DJI and could satisfy government oversight demands while allowing DJI hardware to continue operating legally in the American market.

Outcome 3: The Ban Goes Through ❌

No new DJI systems can be marketed or sold in the United States. This would:

• Devastate the US drone industry overnight
• Create a massive gap that cannot be patched quickly
• Leave the $1,000-$5,000 price range (where most private operators operate) completely unserved

This is the scenario we hope to avoid.

What About Your Current DJI Drones?

If You Already Own DJI Drones

Your existing drones will continue to work. Here’s why:

• The FCC ban only applies to new systems moving forward after December 23rd
• Anything already in the US remains unaffected
• There are over 500,000 DJI drones already in circulation in the US
• Historically, the FCC has never retroactively revoked active authorizations (though they recently gained the power to do so)

Grounding half a million drones—many of which are still used daily by first responders—would be enormous and likely avoidable.

Should You Buy More DJI Drones Now?

Many operators are purchasing newer DJI systems (like the Mini 5 Pro, Neo 2, and enterprise models) ahead of the deadline. If the de facto ban does go into effect, systems purchased before December 23rd will still be completely legal to fly.

The Bottom Line

We have a deadline fast approaching on December 23rd, 2025. While there’s reason to stay optimistic, the situation is serious and affects hundreds of thousands of drone operators across the United States.

Key Takeaways:

1. DJI is not currently banned – existing drones remain legal to fly
2. December 23rd is a regulatory deadline – not a kill switch for your drones
3. The ban would affect new products – not drones already in circulation
4. Three outcomes are possible – extension, divestiture, or full ban
5. Private operators are caught in the middle – of a geopolitical chess game

What We Need

The drone community needs:

• ✅ Clarity and transparency
• ✅ Evidence-based policy decisions
• ✅ A formal security review before sweeping changes
• ✅ Separation between government security needs and private sector freedom

This isn’t about taking sides—it’s about understanding the facts and advocating for reasonable, evidence-based policy that protects national security without unnecessarily disrupting an entire industry.

The reality is that private drone operators are pawns in a massive chess game being played by powerful political figures focused on federal government interests, not the private sector.

---

What are your thoughts on the potential DJI ban? Are you optimistic about December 23rd? Share your perspective in the comments below.